What is the Biometric Processing Privacy Code?
The Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025 is a code of practice issued by the Privacy Commissioner under the Privacy Act 2020. It was issued on 21 July 2025 and sets out 13 rules for organisations that collect and use people's biometric information. For biometric processing that started on or after 3 November 2025, it applied straight away. Organisations that were already using biometrics had a nine-month transition period, which ended on 3 August 2026. In other words, if you have had fingerprint readers on your doors for years, the Code now applies to them.
The Code applies to all organisations, including businesses, schools, NGOs and government agencies. It was amended in March 2026 (Amendment No 1, in force from 1 May 2026) to line up with the new IPP 3A notification rule.
Does it apply to my access control or time clock?
It applies when a system compares or analyses biometric information to verify who someone is, identify them, or categorise them. The Privacy Commissioner's guidance gives fingerprints, palm prints, face images, iris scans and voice as common examples. For a typical commercial site, that means:
- Covered: fingerprint or face readers on doors, gates and turnstiles; biometric time and attendance clocks; face recognition at a site entry; fingerprint login on shared terminals; facial recognition analytics run on CCTV footage.
- Not covered by the Code: card, fob, PIN and mobile phone credentials; CCTV footage that is only watched by people; a staff photo printed on an ID card; camera analytics that detect a person or vehicle without identifying who they are.
Anything outside the Code is still personal information under the Privacy Act if it is about an identifiable person. Our CCTV and Privacy Act guide covers the rules for ordinary camera systems.
What do we have to do to comply?
The Code has 13 rules. For access control and time clocks, these are the ones that drive most of the practical work.
Rule 1: be able to justify it
You need a lawful purpose, and the biometric processing must be necessary (it is effective, and you cannot reasonably achieve the purpose as effectively with something less privacy-intrusive), have appropriate safeguards, and be proportionate to the impact on people. The Privacy Commissioner expects you to look at alternatives such as cards, fobs or PINs, and to weigh up things like the power imbalance in an employment relationship and cultural impacts for Māori, for example where people wear moko. Write the assessment down. It is what you will rely on if a staff member or the Commissioner asks why you chose biometrics.
Rule 3: tell people, clearly, before you collect
Before or when you collect, you must tell people in a "clear and conspicuous" way that biometric information is being collected, why, and whether there is an alternative, plus where to find more information. You also need to tell them who will receive it, your name and address, what happens if they decline, their rights to access, correction and to complain to the Privacy Commissioner, and a summary of how long you keep it. For staff, the natural time to do this is at enrolment, with a sign at the reader as a reminder. You do not need to repeat the full notice every time someone scans in.
Rule 5: protect the templates
Biometric information needs layered security that matches its sensitivity. The guidance specifically suggests keeping only templates rather than raw images where you can, storing locally or on the device where appropriate, keeping biometric data separate from other systems, individual admin logins, patching, and checking what a cloud or software provider does with the data. If a provider holds it for you, you are still responsible.
Rule 9: delete it when you no longer need it
Do not keep biometric information longer than your purpose requires. In practice that means removing a person's templates as part of offboarding when they leave or no longer need access, and setting up automatic deletion where the system allows it.
Other rules cover fair collection, access and correction requests, accuracy, limits on use and disclosure, overseas transfers and categorisation (such as inferring mood or age), which most door access systems do not do.
Is a fingerprint reader still a good idea for our doors?
Sometimes. The Privacy Commissioner's own examples show biometrics can be justified, for example fingerprint verification to protect highly sensitive information, or face recognition to control access to a dangerous worksite where workers in protective gear cannot easily use cards. They also show where it is not justified: face recognition to pay at a school cafeteria was assessed as neither necessary nor proportionate.
For most offices and warehouses, a modern encrypted card, fob or mobile credential does the job with far less privacy risk and paperwork. Where biometrics earns its place is usually high-security rooms (server rooms, pharmacies, cash and evidence stores), sites where shared or passed-on cards are a real problem, or as a second factor alongside a card on the doors that matter most. When we design access control, we start with the risk and the doors, not the gadget.
We already have biometric readers. What should we do now?
- List every biometric device on site: door readers, time clocks, turnstiles, and any face recognition features switched on in CCTV software.
- For each one, write down why you use it and whether a card, fob, PIN or phone would do the same job.
- Check where templates are stored (reader, controller, server or cloud), who can access them, and whether raw images are kept.
- Make sure leavers' templates are deleted as part of offboarding, and clear out old enrolments.
- Put a clear notice at each reader and in your staff privacy information, and offer an alternative credential where you can.
- Talk to your staff. The Privacy Commissioner's examples consistently include consulting the people affected.
- If a device no longer earns its place, switch it to card or mobile and delete the stored biometric data.
A security audit is a straightforward way to get this list together across one or several sites, and our design and consulting service can help you plan a change of credentials without disrupting the business.
How Com4 can help
Com4 has been installing commercial security in Auckland since 2011, as Com4 since 2023, and holds PSPLA licence 25-128630. We can audit what is on your doors, show you where biometric data actually lives in your system, tighten admin access and deletion settings, or move you to card or mobile credentials. We are security contractors, not lawyers, so for the written necessity and proportionality assessment, use the Privacy Commissioner's guidance or your own legal adviser. We work across Auckland, from Penrose and East Tāmaki to the CBD, for commercial and industrial sites, construction projects and healthcare. Call 0800 266 444 or use the form below.
Frequently asked questions
Does the Biometrics Code apply to fingerprint time clocks?
Is ordinary CCTV covered by the Biometric Processing Privacy Code?
Do we have to offer staff an alternative to fingerprints?
How long can we keep fingerprint templates?
What happens if we do not comply?
Sources
- Office of the Privacy Commissioner, Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025
- Office of the Privacy Commissioner, Guidance on complying with the Biometrics Code
- Office of the Privacy Commissioner, Who and what does the Code apply to?
- Office of the Privacy Commissioner, Rule 1: Purpose of collection and Rule 1 examples
- Office of the Privacy Commissioner, Rule 3: Tell people about the information you collect
- Office of the Privacy Commissioner, Rule 5: Security of biometric information and Rule 9: Retention
- Office of the Privacy Commissioner, Complaints under the Code
- Office of the Privacy Commissioner, Using facial recognition to control access to a dangerous worksite
- New Zealand Gazette, Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025 notice (commencement dates)
- New Zealand Legislation, Privacy Act 2020
This guide is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, see the Privacy Commissioner's guidance or get legal advice.
